When AWS is Solid, Integrations Can Be Improved

AWS environments are supported daily for the systems and processes teams rely on. Strong results are usually delivered by AWS itself. More value is typically unlocked through cleaner system connections.

Extend strong AWS foundations through better integrations

Most issues are not caused by AWS services. More improvement is usually found in how AWS is connected to other platforms.

Connections commonly include:

• ERP and finance platforms
• CRM and customer platforms
• Reporting tools and downstream workflows

As environments grow, integration paths are frequently added quickly. Small inefficiencies are then carried into daily work.

Automation can be expanded to remove last step work

Automation is usually present across core workflows. Manual steps can remain at the edges of the process.

These patterns are frequently seen:

• Data is moved automatically until the final step.
• Spreadsheets are used to bridge system gaps.
• People are used as “human middleware.”

With targeted changes, handoffs are reduced. More consistent outcomes are then supported for operations teams.

Cost efficiency can be improved through architecture alignment

Rising AWS spend is not always driven by higher usage. Costs are also influenced by integration design.

Common drivers include:

• Duplicate integrations created over time.
• Point to point designs are extended as needs change.
• Environments are not revisited after launch.

With focused refactoring, waste is reduced. Better performance and reliability are also supported.

What this can mean for mid market teams

Progress is commonly achieved without major replatforming. High impact gains are generally delivered through targeted improvements.

Results may include:

• Simpler system to system data exchange
• Fewer manual handoffs
• Better use of existing AWS services and tooling

If you’re curious how this applies to your environment – or just want a second set of eyes – we’re always happy to talk.

💡Tech Tip: Find the last manual step in your operation

If a process is “mostly automated” but still requires a person to finish it, that final step often:

• creates delays,
• introduces errors,
• and hides downstream cost

A quick exercise:

• Pick one automated flow
• Identify where a human still intervenes
• Ask whether that step exists due to architecture or historical design.

That final manual step is often the highest-value improvement opportunity.

🎇 Happy New Year! 🎇